War's long-term effects
Veil respirator gas mask, London, 1915
War's long-term effects
Soldiers not only suffered on the battlefield. Veterans often needed long-term care owing to the physical and psychological impact of war. The close proximity of people in wartime conditions meant diseases such as tuberculosis could easily spread. The exertion of battle could highlight other health problems including asthma and heart conditions. Some conditions such as trench foot, an infection of the feet caused by cold, wet and unsanitary conditions, were very specific to the water-filled trenches of the First World War (1914-18).
Emotional problems caused by war: shell shock
In addition to physical problems either exacerbated or caused by war, emotional problems could also be brought on by battle. The First World War is often associated with the syndrome called shell shock. This was originally believed to have a physical origin, caused by the impact of loud shelling. However, it became clear that soldiers who had never been exposed to shells were developing the same symptoms. During the horrendous Battle of the Somme in 1916, there was a severe increase in the number of cases.
Little sympathy for shell-shocked soldiers in the First World War
Because of its psychological origins, shell shock was defined as a neurosis, and there was little sympathy for shell-shocked soldiers. Many boys lied about their age to get into the British Army, and many of the fighting forces were ill equipped to deal with the carnage of the western front. Some refused to fight and were shot for cowardice, while others suffered the effects of shell shock for many years afterwards. In the First World War, 306 British soldiers were executed for cowardice - many of these look likely to receive posthumous pardons from the British government.
Psychological testing: assessing the suitability of soldiers
During the Second World War (1939-45) psychiatrists in the United States used psychological testing to determine a recruit’s suitability to be a soldier. Despite these tests, the effects of battle were still hard on soldiers. Many demonstrated symptoms of high levels of stress, a condition referred to as battle fatigue. These soldiers were removed from the fighting and rested. More women were closer to the front lines than in previous wars, but the authorities still thought they were less suited to being close to the fighting than men. A number of men and women were discharged from the forces in the Second World War as they were considered unsuitable for the military.
War syndromes: the impact of war on behaviour and the mind
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was the term used after 1980 to explain the effect of war on soldiers and was later used outside the military to describe the impact of a traumatic event on an individual. However, there is a long history of different diagnoses used to try and get to grips with the psychological impact of war. The most recent war syndromes include Gulf War syndrome, experienced mainly by American and British soldiers who fought in the 1991 Gulf War.
Wartime health of populations: radiation in Japan
War can also have a dramatic impact on the health of civilian populations. The hydrogen bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had a horrendous immediate impact, killing thousands. They also had long-term effects on the population. Radiation sickness and birth defects of children were problems experienced long after the buildings destroyed by the bomb were rebuilt.
Children and war
Civilians, particularly children, can also suffer the effects of trauma. Child psychoanalysis emerged during the Second World War from the work of Anna Freud, psychoanalyst and daughter of Sigmund Freud. She set up a centre for young war victims called the Hampstead War Nursery. Here the children separated from their parents were given foster care. After the war this continued at the Bulldogs Bank Home, an orphanage that was run by Freud’s colleagues and which took care of children who had survived the concentration camps.
The after effects of war for the population
Civilian populations often have to deal with the after effects of war. They include damage to infrastructure such as hospitals and to medical care, often a result of a shortage of doctors. A number of countries, especially in Asia, have had to deal with the devastating effects of land mines on the local population.
Related Themes and Topics
Techniques and Technologies:
P Barker, Regeneration Trilogy (London: Viking, 1996)
R Cooter, ‘Malingering in Modernity’, in R Cooter, M Harrison and S Sturdy (eds), War, Medicine and Modernity (Stroud: Sutton, 1998), pp 125-148
J W Dower, M Hachiya and W Wells, Hiroshima Diary: The Journal of a Japanese Physician, August 6-September 30, 1945 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995)
J Heller, Catch 22 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1955)
J Hersey, Hiroshima (London: Penguin, 1946)
W Holden, Shell Shock: The Psychological Impact of War (London: Channel Four Books, 1998)
J D Howell, ‘Soldier's heart: the redefinition of heart disease and specialty formation in early twentieth-century Great Britain’, Medical History, 5 (1985), pp 34–52
P Leese, Shell Shock: Traumatic Neurosis and the British Soldiers of the First World War (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002)
N Mitchison, You May Well Ask: A Memoir 1920-1940 (London: Victor Gollancz, 1979)
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (OUP, 2005)
O Paul, ‘Da Costa's syndrome or neurocirculatory asthenia’, British Heart Journal, 58/4 (October 1987), pp 306–315
A Richards, The Report of the War Office Committee of Enquiry Into Shell-shock: Featuring a New Historical Essay on Shell Shock, (London: Imperial War Museum, 2004)
D Roberts, Minds at War: Essential Poetry of the First World War in Context (West Sussex: Saxon Books, 1996)
B Shepard, A War of Nerves: Soldiers and Psychiatrists in the Twentieth Century (London; Jonathan Cape, 2000)
S Sturdy, ‘From the trenches to the hospitals at home: physiologists, clinicinas and oxygen therapy’, in J V Pickstone (ed.), Medical Innovations in Historical Perspective (Hampshire: Macmillan, 1992)
J E Talbott, ‘Psychiatrists and Combat Trauma’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 27/3 (Winter 1997), pp 437-54
|Xsl file could not be processed|