Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere remain dangerously high, resulting in ever higher global temperatures. Alongside drastic cuts to emissions, can carbon capture play a role in slowing the pace of climate change?
The climate crisis—How did we get here?
No matter what we do now, it’s too late to avoid climate change... if we recognise climate change and the loss of nature as worldwide security threats, as indeed they are, then we may yet act proportionately, and in time.
David Attenborough, Address to the UN Security Council (2021)
It’s been over 250 years since industrialisation saw fossil fuels adopted as a form of mass energy production, and yet they still account for almost 85% of the world’s energy mix. As a result of continuing to burn coal, oil and natural gas, levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have increased to their highest concentration for over 650,000 years. This has happened at an alarming rate and, if left unchecked, will cause global temperatures to rise even more dramatically, crossing irreversible ‘tipping points’ that will have disastrous consequences for all life on earth.
Scientists have long understood the link between greenhouse gases and rising global temperatures, but only recently has the urgency of the issue been brought into full public focus. Popular media, in particular, has made a significant impact, connecting us to the natural world like never before. Documentaries such as the BBC’s Planet Earth II and National Geographic's Before the Flood have provided immediacy to an issue that can be difficult to communicate conceptually, especially when it comes to the creeping effects of climate change. With the help of celebrity figures such as Leonardo DiCaprio and Greta Thunberg, and the growth of climate protest movements, global warming has never been such a hot topic.
As public pressure grows, governments around the world have committed to a raft of new pledges, including the 2015 Paris Agreement (an agreement to limit planetary warming to below 2 degrees from pre-industrial levels). Along with this shift in policy, steady advances have also been made technologically, and 2020 was a boom year for renewable energy growth.
Even so, the global economy remains heavily reliant on fossil fuels. The world needs to adopt more sustainable sources of energy, as well as tackle existing sources of emissions, in order to mitigate the worst effects of the climate crisis. One avenue of research that seeks to tackle this problem is carbon capture and storage.
What is carbon capture?
Carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) is a term that broadly encapsulates several methods by which carbon dioxide can be removed from the atmosphere, either to be stored or reused within commercial products.
Carbon emissions are taken either from ‘point sources’ where the gases are concentrated (such as factories or power plants), or directly from the air in a process known as ‘direct air capture’ (DAC). These two methods target different stages in the emissions process, and usually incorporate different technologies, but both will likely be necessary to meet our climate goals.
Although chemical methods to reduce carbon emissions from industrial processes have existed for decades, DAC technology has only been actively researched since the 1990s, and it’s only recently that the first commercial examples have been rolled out. Such projects remain at a relatively small scale right now, with the world’s largest DAC plant currently only able to capture around 4,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide every year. This pales in comparison to the 36 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide emitted around the world in the same period. It does, however, provide an important proof of concept, signalling a significant step forward towards large scale direct air capture.
Learning from nature—Artificial trees for carbon capture
Pioneered by the scientist Klaus Lackner, the ‘mechanical tree’ concept offers a visually striking approach to direct air capture. Inspired by their organic counterparts, mechanical trees use specially coated resin ‘leaves’ that can passively absorb carbon dioxide from the air. As the air passes over the leaves, the carbon dioxide binds with a special carbonate to form a bicarbonate powder (a bit like baking soda). After around 20 minutes, the metal limbs of the tree are then retracted into a water tank below, where the leaves release the carbon dioxide for extraction, before the process starts again.
Although Lackner and his team are already working on the second generation of their capture technology, the journey to this point has been a long and difficult one, with the idea first proposed back in 1992. As with any experimental technology, it required a fair amount of improvisation to get going, and at one stage a beer fridge was required for the team’s testing site in the Arizona to prevent the computing equipment from melting under the heat of the sun! Electronic and plumbing issues continued to plague the early designs, earning the machine the (somewhat) affectionate nickname ‘Cranky’.
Despite these early challenges, the mechanical tree concept is now being rolled out across the world. When at scale, these ‘carbon farms’ would be capable of absorbing up to 4 million tonnes of CO2 each year. To match the billions of tonnes of emissions produced every year, however, we would require these 21st century technological forests to become a much more common sight in our landscapes, just as wind turbines have become.
DAC solutions such as these only make up part of the global carbon capture solution, however. Whilst these 'trees' may be many times more efficient at capturing carbon than their natural counterparts, they do not bring with them the same benefits in terms of habitats and biodiversity for local wildlife. Additionally, they only work to remove carbon dioxide that has already been released into the air, doing nothing to reduce the huge quantities of emissions still being produced by factories and the energy industry. To tackle this issue, other carbon capture and carbon reduction methods will need to be adopted.
One way to approach this problem is by using various chemical solvents and filters. For example, it’s now possible to retrofit carbon capture devices onto the exhaust flues of factories and power stations, with chemicals binding to carbon emissions in a similar way to the carbonates used in the mechanical tree. The resulting material can then be separated and treated before the solvent is refreshed and reused. This technique has the advantages of being adaptable to current technologies, keeping costs low and making carbon reduction a more attractive option.
There are concerns about the principles of carbon capture, including the potential for it to justify ongoing fossil fuel use and to reduce our sense of urgency about the need to transition to more sustainable energy sources. Certainly carbon capture should only be seen as one of a suite of technological solutions to the immediate climate crisis, working alongside longer-term schemes to massively reduce the use of fossil fuels across industry, eventually eliminating their use completely.
Where do you store captured carbon?
Once we’ve captured the carbon dioxide, what can we do to prevent it from being released back into the atmosphere? After all, carbon capture is only useful if we can lock away the carbon we collect.
One method being explored is ‘deep geological storage’, where the captured carbon is combined with water and pumped deep underground to be absorbed within porous sedimentary rock. By ‘fixing’ the carbon as a mineral in this way, it can be stored safely for potentially millions of years, with harder (less porous) ‘cap rocks’ used to prevent any leakage to the surface. Old oil and gas fields make particularly suitable candidates for use as storage locations, because of the need to understand the geology of the site for ongoing monitoring, as well as them being filled with the right types of porous rock. This method could serve as a symbolic end to humanity’s relationship with fossil fuels, locking the carbon back underground in areas where we have spent hundreds of years digging it out.
Geological storage provides a solution on a mass scale, and it is currently being used at several sites around the world. One such example is the Carbfix injection site in Iceland, which has taken carbon dioxide captured by Climeworks DAC machines and stored over 70,000 tonnes deep underground in mineral form.
Beyond locking the carbon away, however, there are also some intriguing solutions that seek to make use of the captured carbon. These included setting it within concrete, which can not only help to negate the high carbon-impact of concrete production, but can also actually increase the concrete’s compressive strength, leading to better building materials.
There are also ideas to use captured carbon in the production of a small number of commercial products, with the Carbon XPRIZE celebrating carbon-capture products ranging from yoga mats to pens and sunglasses to toothpaste. Although these will all likely be a less permanent storage solution than geological storage, such products do indicate that there could be money to be made by retrieving carbon from the air, further incentivising business to tackle the climate crisis.
carbon objects
PRODUCTS MADE WITH CAPTURED CARBON:
Carbon capture—One of many solutions to climate change
Carbon capture remains just one of many solutions to the climate crisis. To be successful it must be implemented alongside drastic emission reductions across sectors such as energy, transport and agriculture. Beyond technological innovation, there are also nature-based solutions, such as better environmental management and conservation, including the maintenance of forests, ocean ecosystems and other natural ‘carbon sinks’.
Climate change remains one of the greatest threats we’ve ever faced as a species, and we must adopt a range of solutions if we are to meet the challenge. Besides transitioning to renewable energy, technologies such as the capture and storage of carbon dioxide will help prevent harmful emissions from reaching the atmosphere or remove them retrospectively. No single technology or person can stop climate change on their own, but scientific innovation and collaboration can give us cause for hope in our future.
Find out more
Online
- British Geological Survey, Understanding carbon capture and storage
- Climeworks
- Climate Change Committee
- COP26
- The Guardian, News about carbon capture and storage
- United Nations, The Climate Crisis – A race we can win